




PARTICIPANT ACTION COMMITMENTS
RockRose Institute is a 501(c)(3) public charity. All contributions are tax deductible.
PO Box 29317, San Francisco CA 94129-0317 (415) 561-3232 (415) 561-3233 fax
info@rockroseinstitute.org www.rockroseinstitute.org
All content © copyright RockRose Institute 2006 All Rights Reserved


Tom Gage, Professor Emeritus of English at Humboldt State University
When I consider how the RockRose Institute and last January’s conference affected me, I paraphrased Walt Whitman’s utterance to Emerson: I was simmering until RockRose, when I was set a boil. After 9/11, I regretted that as a professor I was ill-positioned to do much to ameliorate the mess into which we were getting ourselves internationally, a mess exponentially compounded from fear and ignorance. I've a unique history of international experiences in that I have been involved longer in the Middle East than I have been in education, a career I retired from in 2000. In 1958 as a sophomore at Berkeley, I hitchhiked from Oakland to Damascus and have subsequently spent more than half of my seventy years in the eastern Mediterranean, as traveler, Fulbright lecturer, and teacher.
When I learned of the four San Francisco lawyers who created RockRose Institute with the generosity of many contributors, what was kindling in me was set ablaze. Since last year’s World Forum, that blaze is localized in six activities, which you can peruse by linking to the following URLs.
1. Cross-cultural Fluency. I have developed curriculum and am implementing a unit of study about cross-cultural fluency (''CCF'') for secondary writing programs in California and the world that entails: 1. Electronically connecting adolescents with twins in paired classrooms, one here and one abroad; and 2. Improving students’ writing skills while dialoguing to learn about each other’s culture. I have initiated contact with California’s Department of Education and leaders of the National Council of Teachers of English to create a network of CCF twins. (http://www.humboldt.edu/~teg1/syllabus/424/ccf.html)
2. Speaking about CCF. To promote CCF programs, I have delivered papers at the U of Texas (http://raindropturkevi.org/theottomans/speakers.php), the U of Erasmus in Rotterdam (http://youtube.com/watch?v=HCwt6EA4AOE), and the U of Fathi in Istanbul (http://h08.cgpublisher.com/proposals/121).
3. Networking. Through a representative I met at RockRose’s World Forum last year, I have worked with an organization of Turkish Muslims dedicated to tolerance, dialogue, and peace to further good will and mutual understanding, an organization inspired by the Islamic scholar Hoca Effendi Fethuallah Gulen. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt11e2ZThXU&NR=1)
4. Teaching. I am teaching through Osher Life Long Institute at Humboldt State University a course entitled What We Should Know about Islam. (http://www.humboldt.edu/~teg1/rrr-syllabus.html)
5. Planning Conferences. I have organized conferences with the Curriculum Study Commission featuring or solely devoted to CCF at Asilomar for September 2008 and April 2009. (http://www.cccoe.net/csc/index.htm)
6. Consulting. I have become a board member of Consultants for Global Programs, which arranges for travel to teach and interact in the regions populated by the most minorities of China. (http://www.globalprograms.com/)(http://www.fethullahgulen.org/)
Should you be interested in assisting in any of these efforts, please contact me at gaget@northcoast.com
SAN FRANCISCO and OAKLAND YOUTH STUDY ABROAD IN BEIJING
World Forum 2007 represented an intersection of races, religions and cultures in a dialog about international relations and inter-group peace. In the spirit of the conversation arising from that meeting of minds, Silena Layne (Opportunity Impact) and LeeAnn Mallorie (Learning as Leadership and The Cultural Horizons Institute) – who met at the Forum – are teaming up to send Bay Area youth to study and travel in China.
The project will support eight recent high school graduates from underprivileged communities in Oakland and San Francisco to travel to Beijing, China to study Mandarin, Chinese. The students will study history and culture, as well as Eastern Religion and Chinese martial arts. After attending classes on the campus of the Beijing Sports University, they will travel for one week to visit several of the historic and religious landmarks referenced in their studies. Students will also learn basic ESL instruction techniques and take on a part-time job tutoring English for their Chinese student counterparts.
Both Silena and LeeAnn believe the study abroad experience is a valuable way for youth to develop basic adult life skills in addition to broadening their perspective on cultural norms and values. Their hope is that students will develop personal confidence while mastering a second language and will build their capacity to navigate new, difficult or unknown situations. Prior to their departure, students are participating in two weekends of dialog, intercultural communication training and travel readiness preparation. The training, sponsored by the Cultural Horizons Institute, will ensure that students get the most out of their time abroad.
The goal of this pilot project is to form the infrastructure for future exchange programs in the Bay Area. Silena and LeAnn are currently in the process of fundraising for students’ tuition and airfare to travel abroad. If you have any resources (financial, informational, training, etc.) to offer the project, or would like to be kept in the loop about its progress, please contact LeeAnn at lmallorie@gmail.com or Silena at silena@opportunityimpact.org.

USING TOOLS LEARNT IN THE WORLD FORUM YDP AT THE NGAI TAHU MAORI LAW CENTRE, AOTEAROA-NEW ZEALAND
By Nadine Warbrick
When I reflect on my experiences from the Youth Dialogue Project and techniques learnt in the World Forum 2007, I realise this experience has advanced my skills in the area of law in which I work. I work for a community organisation that represents the indigenous peoples of Aotearoa-New Zealand in mainly land, resource management, trusts and other unique issues to Maori. I frequently need to refer to the simple methods of cross-cultural communication, active listening and interpretation we learnt in the Learning Lab and in training for the Youth Dialogue Project.
The programmes and methods we trained in such as the World Café Method and Facing History and Ourselves, prepared me for the collective intergenerational dialogue I would be coming across every day in my work. Maori land accounts for 6% of the total land mass in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Maori currently make up 15% of the population. Some land blocks therefore have as many as one, to tens of thousands of owners on one title. Maori land (with ancestral connection) is collectively owned, and owners (usually extended familial relationships) are forced to reach consensus on heated topical issues for the purposes of administration and development of the land, and therefore develop the people who connect to this land. It can be frustrating as the Maori Land Court is a mandatory interference for development and administration on Maori land, and sometimes acts as a “rubber stamp” for collective decisions made by Maori. There are few (if any) specialised Maori mediators who understand the nature of Maori land, the character of historical disputes and the Court application process. This largely hinders development of Maori land and the potential development of an economic base for many Maori.
As one can predict, there is a large need for the Maori youth, being the next collective land owners, to be trained in intergenerational and cross-cultural dialogue. There are currently no education programmes for free mediation or dispute resolution programmes offered for Maori land owners, apart from the occasional workshops we run from our law centre. I hope to promote the use of mediation with traditional methods and values of dispute resolution in my career and hope to pay forward the techniques I have gained from the Youth Dialogue Project.
At the Ngai Tahu Maori Law Centre, Dunedin, Aotearoa-New Zealand, we integrate traditional Maori values into the dialogue processes we practiced in the YDP and at the Forum for decision making and dispute resolution. These values bring better success to other alternative dispute resolution methods.
Practicing in Maori land law is difficult because tools for mediation are rare. What is more often used are Maori values in relation to dispute resolution.
•Whanaungatanga: Inter-relatedness is the basis for voluntary consensus and somewhat obligatory as everything is connected.
•There is no labelling of “victims” and “offenders”: offenders are also treated as victims and family members (also extended family members) take responsibility for conflict.
•Wairua or Whatumanawa: when a settlement “feels right” or a person has a “gut feeling” it is settled, then the agreement can be recognised as settling the problem.
(For more in this, see Dispute Resolution in New Zealand, Peter Spiller (Ed), Chapter on Maori Dispute Resolution [by Ian MacDuff]).
Summary Action Commitments Forum Design Arts Supporters Partners Speakers Action Now Photo Gallery 1, 2, 3